Eight carved chair crests present a question our workshop answers deliberately: should they be identical, or should they merely match?
Identical is achievable. Every crest could be carved to the same template and worked to the same depth, cut for cut. It would look correct, and it would look machined, because the one thing hand carving offers that a router does not is that no two passes are the same.
So we split the difference. The silhouette is fixed absolutely: every crest is marked from a single master template, so the outline, the height and the width of all eight are the same, and a row of chairs down the table reads as one set at a glance. Within that outline, the leaf work, the depth of the undercuts and the flow of each scroll are left to the carver's hand.
Stand back and they are identical. Sit down and look at the chair next to you and it is its own carving - the leaves turn slightly differently, one scroll is cut a shade deeper. Ten years later the family knows which chair is which without ever having been told.
That is the argument for hand carving in a matched set. Uniform where uniformity matters, individual everywhere it does not.